FANDOM

Weedle McHairybug

aka Eric Otness

  • I live in Dunwoody, Georgia
  • I was born on February 14
  • I am Male
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hi Weedle. I just wanted to offer you a suggestion. Most of the comments you write are pretty negative about Beauty and the Beast. Why not write about Disney things that make you happy? Like how much Ariel means to you? It might cheer you up.

      Loading editor
    • View all 6 replies
    • Ratigan6688 wrote: Ariel I know. Misty, I don't know who that is.

      Misty's a character from Pokémon. One of Ash's original traveling companions, her goal was to become a Water Pokémon Master.

        Loading editor
    • Oh yes! I totally forgot! I remember now!

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Not exactly the case. Her magic was unable to reflect the sword of truth, and the shield, so that tells you she's not invincible to the three good fairies' power. Her reaction to Diablo's stone state is a pretty huge implication that restoring him (if she even could) wasn't going to be an easy fix.

      Loading editor
    • First of all, I don't remember her even ATTEMPTING to use her magic on the Sword of Truth. Second of all, correct me if I'm mistaken, but didn't her dragon state pretty much knock away the Shield of Virtue into the fiery abyss with that flame blast? That would suggest that her magic was more than capable of reflecting at the very least the shield, And third of all, I'm pretty sure the fact that Merriweather's attempts at weakening the spell only resulted in Aurora being put into a coma that would be undone from true love's kiss due to Maleficent's magic being far too powerful to undo fully would strongly suggest that she and her magic was if anything much stronger than the three good fairies' magic even if she's not invincible to it, meaning she'd definitely be more than capable of undoing Diablo's stone state from Merriweather.

        Loading editor
    • Weedle McHairybug wrote: First of all, I don't remember her even ATTEMPTING to use her magic on the Sword of Truth. Second of all, correct me if I'm mistaken, but didn't her dragon state pretty much knock away the Shield of Virtue into the fiery abyss with that flame blast? That would suggest that her magic was more than capable of reflecting at the very least the shield, And third of all, I'm pretty sure the fact that Merriweather's attempts at weakening the spell only resulted in Aurora being put into a coma that would be undone from true love's kiss due to Maleficent's magic being far too powerful to undo fully would strongly suggest that she and her magic was if anything much stronger than the three good fairies' magic even if she's not invincible to it, meaning she'd definitely be more than capable of undoing Diablo's stone state from Merriweather.

      The fact that Marryweather altered the original curse is just another example that her magic isn't untouchable. If Maleficent was "far more powerful", she could just undo Merryweather's tampering and have Aurora die as intended. Yet she couldn't. It's not one sided, neither parties are invincible to the other. We have no proof that she could revive Diablo, so putting it into the article would be speculation and that's not allowed.

        Loading editor
    • Hey1234 wrote:

      Weedle McHairybug wrote: First of all, I don't remember her even ATTEMPTING to use her magic on the Sword of Truth. Second of all, correct me if I'm mistaken, but didn't her dragon state pretty much knock away the Shield of Virtue into the fiery abyss with that flame blast? That would suggest that her magic was more than capable of reflecting at the very least the shield, And third of all, I'm pretty sure the fact that Merriweather's attempts at weakening the spell only resulted in Aurora being put into a coma that would be undone from true love's kiss due to Maleficent's magic being far too powerful to undo fully would strongly suggest that she and her magic was if anything much stronger than the three good fairies' magic even if she's not invincible to it, meaning she'd definitely be more than capable of undoing Diablo's stone state from Merriweather.

      The fact that Marryweather altered the original curse is just another example that her magic isn't untouchable. If Maleficent was "far more powerful", she could just undo Merryweather's tampering and have Aurora die as intended. Yet she couldn't. It's not one sided, neither parties are invincible to the other. We have no proof that she could revive Diablo, so putting it into the article would be speculation and that's not allowed.

      I never said, or even implied, that her magic was "untouchable", just that it was more powerful (and I can reverse that since you seem to be implying that their magic was stronger. If that was truly the case, they would have just undone the curse altogether and there wouldn't even BE a movie as it is).

      And as far as whether Maleficent could undo it, just chalk it up to Bond Villain Stupidity in her case. Don't forget, she didn't exactly think to specify to her goons that they take into account aging. And considering that Maleficent strikes me as the type to be extremely sadistic (she was perfectly willing to lock Phillip and his horse up for a century and release him only when he was nearly on death's door and restore Aurora simply to break the two of them), what makes you think that she simply chose not to undo it because she found it to be an even more sick, and thus better plan for her than her original plan of having Aurora die, akin to Xanatos speed chess in other words? Heck, she didn't even seem to be particularly upset that Merriweather managed to tone down the curse, in fact, she doesn't even seem to even MENTION it either.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Unless you want to end up permanently banned, I'd discontinue from making long lectures/opinions/claims/whatever over something and always trying to get the last word when people disagree. Referencing actual figures involved in politicians and things like that are what got you blocked for a year in the first place. Unless you don't want that to happen again you need to change.

    I say this because I care. You have a talent for knowledge, but it must be tamed. Knowing when and when not to write.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi Weedle!

    Welcome back! It's been a while.

    How did you like the new Beauty and the Beast movie?

      Loading editor
    • Didn't see it, nor do I plan to (shame really, it had quite a bit of potential, such as actually sticking closer to the story, actually making Belle nicer in this, and actually having the triplets actually ACT like they have inner ugliness in this.).

        Loading editor
    • Oh. Well I saw it and I enjoyed it

        Loading editor
    • PandaGirl1 wrote: Oh. Well I saw it and I enjoyed it

      Yeah. Honestly, Condon shouldn't have opened his big fat mouth about a certain element of LeFou. The bit about the villagers not tolerating Belle's ability to read to such an extent that they kicked her out of school and Beast looking like Bahomet didn't help matters either.

      Well, at least the triplets now actually ARE demonstrated to have inner ugliness, not to mention actually pale in comparison to Belle regarding outer beauty (which actually fixed some flaws from the original movie, since the triplets there seemed more the type to BE beautiful in and out while Belle of all people came across as only skin-deep beauty, not helping matters is that the triplets had the kinds of bods that you would expect to see from Team Ninja's Dead or Alive series).

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • If you are writing up a long message to describe your reasons for why your edits should remain, forget it because I'm not going to read it. I am not interested in your reasons and nor do I have a logical explanation for why I undid it. I don't see any point in explaining anything to you nowadays. The definition that comes close to it is intuition and the fact that not everything you do will be accepted.

      Loading editor
    • You honestly think I'm NOT aware that not everything I do will be accepted? Of course I'm aware that not everything I do will be accepted. But the problem is this is a wikia, and we have to cover all things official and cite them. If our roles were switched around, and you posted that email, I would have retained it precisely because it's an official source, meaning I have NO CHOICE but to let it remain because I must retain anything that is officially cited.

      I mean, I could understand, say, your removal of the bit about them being from Alsace, France, since there's nothing official stating they were from that area besides the champaigne bottles having the Alsace ribbon (and for the record, that was one of my edits), but removing something actually stated from an email by the author of those comics?

        Loading editor
    • Like I said not everything you do will be accepted. You've already committed an edit war on that page with SilverFlight, and that is something you're not going to do with Me. It's not the information I'm concerned about, it's you being back here and hoping that you will not return to your old ways.

      I don't want any of your long comments or messaging on things that you believe should be on here, or insisting keeping something that is discarded.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi Weedle. I heard that you got blocked off for quite a while. I just wanted to check in and make sure you were okay.

      Loading editor
    • View all 9 replies
    • Ratigan6688 wrote: Well, obviously I don't know what that comment was, but my suggestion is you might want to make your comments a little shorter and save whatever you were talking about for a blog post of your own.

      Well, long story short, I was mentioning a few more jerk moves that Katzenberg did, like nearly ruining Toy Story and by extension Pixar with the Black Friday reel (long story short, he forced Pixar to adopt an "adult, cynical, edgy" story that made Woody into a murderous jerkwad and the toys not being much better), him doing needless rewrites for Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin (the latter of which also had him neglecting to extend the deadline, resulting in a real rush to complete the film), him being one of the reasons why 2D Animation is dying out, and him pretty much laying off 350 people from DreamWorks Animation just because Rise of the Guardians didn't match his expectations. Oh, and also him probably being responsible for Disney becoming more left-wing starting with Beauty and the Beast when he and Woolverton shoehorned a feminist message that had no relevancy to the true beauty coming from within moral.

        Loading editor
    • Wow! Jeffrey is even more dislikable than I thought!

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • You better make it up to those who you said that hateful comment about the rights of people. And I hope you learned your lesson.

      Loading editor
    • Oh, rights. Edward, you do not have any right to frame this user, like you framed my girlfriend. You should know that what you did has results, and that you, my friend Edward, should feel ashamed of what you have done. I suggest for you, Weedle, that you tell Edward exactly how you felt. Teach him a lesson.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I think it would be better if we emailed each other. I shouldn't be using the Disney wiki as a message board. I have sent you an e-mail on things that I would like edited. Thank-you so much by the way

      Loading editor
  • Also if you could, list Star Wars: Your Great Big Galaxy: Hop aboard the Millenium Falcon and explore outer space with your favorite Heroes! on the 2016 page, coming out October 4th.


    Thanks so much.

      Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message