Unless you want to end up permanently banned, I'd discontinue from making long lectures/opinions/claims/whatever over something and always trying to get the last word when people disagree. Referencing actual figures involved in politicians and things like that are what got you blocked for a year in the first place. Unless you don't want that to happen again you need to change.
I say this because I care. You have a talent for knowledge, but it must be tamed. Knowing when and when not to write.
Didn't see it, nor do I plan to (shame really, it had quite a bit of potential, such as actually sticking closer to the story, actually making Belle nicer in this, and actually having the triplets actually ACT like they have inner ugliness in this.).
Oh. Well I saw it and I enjoyed it
Yeah. Honestly, Condon shouldn't have opened his big fat mouth about a certain element of LeFou. The bit about the villagers not tolerating Belle's ability to read to such an extent that they kicked her out of school and Beast looking like Bahomet didn't help matters either.
Well, at least the triplets now actually ARE demonstrated to have inner ugliness, not to mention actually pale in comparison to Belle regarding outer beauty (which actually fixed some flaws from the original movie, since the triplets there seemed more the type to BE beautiful in and out while Belle of all people came across as only skin-deep beauty, not helping matters is that the triplets had the kinds of bods that you would expect to see from Team Ninja's Dead or Alive series).
If you are writing up a long message to describe your reasons for why your edits should remain, forget it because I'm not going to read it. I am not interested in your reasons and nor do I have a logical explanation for why I undid it. I don't see any point in explaining anything to you nowadays. The definition that comes close to it is intuition and the fact that not everything you do will be accepted.
You honestly think I'm NOT aware that not everything I do will be accepted? Of course I'm aware that not everything I do will be accepted. But the problem is this is a wikia, and we have to cover all things official and cite them. If our roles were switched around, and you posted that email, I would have retained it precisely because it's an official source, meaning I have NO CHOICE but to let it remain because I must retain anything that is officially cited.
I mean, I could understand, say, your removal of the bit about them being from Alsace, France, since there's nothing official stating they were from that area besides the champaigne bottles having the Alsace ribbon (and for the record, that was one of my edits), but removing something actually stated from an email by the author of those comics?
Like I said not everything you do will be accepted. You've already committed an edit war on that page with SilverFlight, and that is something you're not going to do with Me. It's not the information I'm concerned about, it's you being back here and hoping that you will not return to your old ways.
I don't want any of your long comments or messaging on things that you believe should be on here, or insisting keeping something that is discarded.
Well, obviously I don't know what that comment was, but my suggestion is you might want to make your comments a little shorter and save whatever you were talking about for a blog post of your own.
Well, long story short, I was mentioning a few more jerk moves that Katzenberg did, like nearly ruining Toy Story and by extension Pixar with the Black Friday reel (long story short, he forced Pixar to adopt an "adult, cynical, edgy" story that made Woody into a murderous jerkwad and the toys not being much better), him doing needless rewrites for Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin (the latter of which also had him neglecting to extend the deadline, resulting in a real rush to complete the film), him being one of the reasons why 2D Animation is dying out, and him pretty much laying off 350 people from DreamWorks Animation just because Rise of the Guardians didn't match his expectations. Oh, and also him probably being responsible for Disney becoming more left-wing starting with Beauty and the Beast when he and Woolverton shoehorned a feminist message that had no relevancy to the true beauty coming from within moral.
Oh, rights. Edward, you do not have any right to frame this user, like you framed my girlfriend. You should know that what you did has results, and that you, my friend Edward, should feel ashamed of what you have done. I suggest for you, Weedle, that you tell Edward exactly how you felt. Teach him a lesson.
BTW, CoolioHulioo? I just looked up your block log on Wookieepedia. I'm not sure if Cade Calrayn changed how long you were banned since the last time you checked, but the block log indicates you're now banned for far longer than just until 2019. In fact... it indicates you're permanently banned.