Your edits are rejected, and I won't have reverting. Furthermore, those sections need a clear out, as in erasing stuff not adding more. I don't care what research you have put into those edits you made, I don't approve. There is too much in the relatives section as it is, and a few things need to go.
Those are all Max's and Goofy's relatives from the Goof Troop cartoon's 'Goof History' episodes ("Goofin Hood and his Meloncholy Men", "The Ungoofables", "Sherlock Goof", "Gunfight at the Okie Doke Corral", and "Clan of the Cave Goof"), as well as the episodes "Hallow-Weenies", "Calling All Goofs", and "Frankengoof". All the information is official and accurate to how it was given in those episodes. If you need to verify the sources, just look up the episodes and see for yourself. Why leave out what is official Goof family information?
I do not believe the relatives in Goof Troop count. If they did count we would have had them up a long time ago. Because they haven't been noted then there must be a reason behind it. There are a lot of questions.
Why would they not count when a bunch of other way more obscure relatives from old comics would count? In fact, several of those more obscure relatives (like Gaffy, Geefy, Gilbert, etc.) don't even have any official familial ties to Max, only to Goofy, and not even the version of Goofy from Goof Troop. Plus, Debbie and the "Calling All Goofs" relatives get to stay and they were exclusive to Goof Troop too. Your decision to keep only some of the Goof Troop relatives and not others seems very arbitrary.
Have you even asked yourself why they weren't noted before or asked the Admins if it's okay to publish?
They were noted on the main Goof Troop article's character section, so I figured that there was no harm in their being included on the pages for the characters whose family they are a part of.
As for why they weren't noted on those pages beforehand, I figured it was because Goof Troop simply isn't popular enough for most people to have bothered putting the effort into going through the series to add in any missing information from the show to its proper online reference places. I, however, like Goof Troop enough to go through it and fill out the missing info from the show, and I plan to continue adding more missing info to fill in all the holes and provide a much more proper and presentable coverage of the show (as, let's face it, the current state of Goof Troop coverage on here is pretty bare-boned, which is to be expected from a show that doesn't have a whole lot of fans to support its coverage).
Your terms "great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather" looks ridiculous.
I can't help that that's how Goofy referred to Goofin Hood in the episode. It is what it is.
(Also, you changed a link to Bobby's page on Goofy's page from a direct link to a redirect. "Zimuruski" is the official spelling of his last name given in both the DVD subtitles and the official comic book adaptation of A Goofy Movie. The "Zimmeruski" spelling has no official source.)
Alright I'll permit, since I honestly don't know much about the Goof Troop universe. However, may I make a suggestion? Instead of writing "great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather" just write "ninth great-grandfather". It will look neater that way. It's been done on the Star vs. the Forces of Evil Wiki and I've done it on our own articles on the show.
"Ninth great-grandfather" (and "Tenth great-granddad" for Max's page) does sound more manageable. Thank you.
I'm glad we could work this out. Goof Troop, while not perfect, I find to be an underrated gem of a show that simply was the unfortunate victim of being the first sitcom introduced in The Disney Afternoon at a time when all of its contemporaries were action/adventure shows. It explored and fleshed out Goofy's extended family (and Pete's extended family, to a lesser extent) more than any other animated Disney work, and spawned a fantastic first movie (and an okay second movie), but sadly most won't give it the time of day it deserves since it wasn't as "cool" or "exciting" as the likes of DuckTales, Chip n' Dale, Talespin, Darkwing Duck, Gargoyles, Aladdin, etc.
People will speak of A Goofy Movie with reverence (as is appropriate), but Goof Troop itself gets more scorn and ridicule than not. It's not perfect, no, but it did do a lot for Goofy, Max, and Pete as characters and left its legacy in all subsequent media that featured Max as Goofy's son. I intend to honor Goof Troop for its contribution to the Disney brand, even if its not as lovingly remembered by everyone as other Disney cartoons of its era.
Truth be told, I've recently been trying to acquire as much Goof Troop-related media that I can find, including all the old Disney Adventures magazine issues that had Goof Troop comics in them. And some of those comics may prove rather useful and informative in expanding on the Goof Troop-related info here. One of the comics even goes into what might possibly be the origin of Spoonerville (the town Goof Troop takes place in), which could be very useful in a future update to the Spoonerville article on here. ;-)
So, yeah, if you ever need any Goof Troop-related help or questions answered, feel free to ask and I can find the episode or movie or comic or whatever needed as a source of Goof Troop-related info. Cheers.
Thinking more about what you said about clearing out some names, I think something could be done about the relatives of Goofy that are listed on Max's page but which have never been officially associated with either Max or the 1950s Goofy Junior. Specifically, Gilbert Goof, Captain Goof-Beard, Grandma Goofy, and Gaffy.
While all of these people have been affiliated with Goofy himself in some way, they've only been so in media that Max/Goofy Junior doesn't seem to exist in, and in turn none of them have been confirmed to exist in either Goof Troop (or its related media) or in the 1950s George Geef shorts.
Any thoughts on taking just those four out of just Max's page?
Also, I would greatly appreciate it if such inquiries as this were to be asked before having my edits undone. I'm a reasonable person and don't make a habit of spreading misinformation (misinfo rather irks me, to be frank), so I'd rather have communications opened more freely so as to avoid any potential edit conflicts that may arise from any misunderstandings had from my edits. I tend to draw directly from the source material or other official venues when it comes to adding new or corrected information to such reference resources as this or any other website. Any and all cooperation in this would be greatly appreciated, thank you.